In Germany, men can get pregnant

image.png

Photo

“In theory, a man can carry a pregnancy... in the peritoneum”. It sounds like the prologue of a satirical tale or the surreal dialogue of a dystopian novel. Instead, it is what was stated, with surgical seriousness and a tone of moral superiority, by the German Green Party MP, Susan Sziborra-Seidlitz, in the parliamentary chamber in Magdeburg on June 13th. Not on a talk show. Not in a tweet. In the regional Parliament of Saxony-Anhalt. In front of a microphone and with full democratic legitimacy.

The occasion was a debate with the AfD, during which Sziborra staged the perfect spectacle of woke ideology in legislative form. A mix of ideological attacks, scientific victimhood, academic veneration for the texts of Judith Butler – the Mein Kampf of the woke – and a display of intellectual sarcasm that culminates in the final paradox.

To the provocative but direct question from the opposition, “How many genders exist and can a man have children?” the MP responds as follows:

“The answer to the first question is 42. Always 42.”

42 is a reference to the science fiction novel The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, where it is said that “42” is the answer to all the questions in the universe. Instead of clarifying, the MP takes refuge in tired ironic nonsense, then arrives at the climax:

“The answer to the second question might disturb you. But yes, in theory a man can carry a pregnancy, in the peritoneum.”

And she continues:

“The difficulty is that the peritoneum is not irrigated like a placenta, and such a pregnancy would last at most seven months. The baby probably wouldn’t be viable. It is theoretically possible. But practically it should not be attempted.”

This surreal statement is not isolated; it is the fruit of an entire worldview. Sziborra launches into an attack against the AfD, accusing them of wanting to “erase science,” and delivers a heartfelt ode to gender medicine (Gendermedizin), feminism courses, women's history, and universities as bastions of woke truth.

In an ideological crescendo, she declares:

“You don’t respect Judith Butler... but her theories on the construction of gender are as fundamental as those of Marx, Weber or Adorno.”

And so here we are: biology is no longer a natural science, but a cultural battleground.

The message is clear: objective limits no longer exist. If theory says a man can be pregnant, then the problem is with whoever dares to doubt it. Never mind that biological reality says otherwise. A dash of academic literature, a hint of sarcasm, and the right political backing are enough to make every natural dogma “surpassable.”

The Sziborra-Seidlitz case shows us where ideology leads when pushed to the extreme. The uterus is no longer a biological organ, but a fluid idea, transplantable, theoretically installable in any thinking body. Perhaps in the peritoneum, as the MP suggests.

Identity is self-perceived. Limits are offensive. The body is flexible. Science is one proposal among many. And if you say “it doesn’t make sense,” you’re already suspected of “constitutional hate.”

We are facing a utopia that challenges logic.

With the lenses of woke ideology, everything is possible. Infinite genders, pregnant men, science reduced to academic fiction. The problem is not the absurdity. The problem is that it is demanded to be normalized, funded, and taught as objective truth.

And while citizens seek concrete answers on healthcare, work, and education, Parliament discusses whether the uterus can migrate into the male belly.
Right. Theoretically possible. Sure. Even flying by flapping your arms, in the end, is “theoretically” feasible.



0
0
0.000
1 comments