Bye Biden

People who identify a conservatives already tend to come out in higher numbers percentage wise to vote. I don't think the assassination attempt moved the pendulum much, if at all.

Idk what to think, my homie got hurt yesterday by politics.
Well, polític fans.
Venezuela is a little hot when talking about this...

!DOOK

But also no: she has no chance; nobody has a chance against Trump.

I’ve hadn’t heard the fat lady sing.

Just when they thought it was Biden time, it turned out to be biding time.

How are you going to write in your letter that America has the strongest economy lol the F. Such dumb frame worked letters all the time I wonder if anyone really gets anything done in the government anymore it's blows my mind just how wasteful our government has become.

If they put Kamala in she will pull women votes for sure because you know people like to just be inclusive and not really care the skill level of people anymore which is why we are in this mess.

Assuming things go that way come November, it should be pretty easy for me as a middle aged white American male to just keep my head down and do my own thing for the next four years. Others may not be so lucky and that's scary.

Biden did what was right (at least for himself).

I actually wrote about the crowdstrike thing for today’s post. It’s one of the worst things about this forced centralization that’s been happening. Most people were t aware how pervasive they were and how vulnerable it all is until someone completely fucks up the QA process like they did. Oops.

I would love to go back to the early days of the internet when there were many companies around doing these things. We have a fair amount today but not as many as then I think. We need to move back to more competition which leads to companies not sucking!

I find it hilarious how one minute he's scoffing at the idea of not running, to this letter which reads as if he's known all along. I wish he had defined "progress as a nation", usually that includes strong borders, clearly defined sovereignty, military victories, diplomatic respect. But under his regime, it's been a disaster on all fronts.

I shutter to think of four years under that witch Kamala... and probably another woman vice-president, since that's a thing now. Double trouble, boil and bubble, MAGA extremest six feet under.

God save our nation.

It's a total joke. But if you look at it from the perspective that they are intentionally trying to destroy America, it makes more sense.

Wow biden has Covid, I thought that saga ended, it's quite unfortunately that it happened around that time controversial stories will spread and you won't blame people for believing them.

Although I do believe Trump will win as this somewhat is looking like the prediction of Jake Ricard. Thanks for the update on BTC going to make an article on that after I check out more on that.

Honestly, this election is the craziest I’ve ever seen
Why would Biden contest when he knew he was going to quit on the long run
I don’t really trust Trump too though

Good luck with the parsing. Is it all even parsable?? Ha!

With the look of things, I think trump is coming back into power and kamala can't stand a chance with him. it won't be an easy one for her

The political drama feels overwhelming, but the focus on real issues might help us navigate these times better. But I believe it was an inevitable outcome. He's old and unwell.

I've seen the news in the morning. Shocking. I'm not sure where this is going as the world seems a less safe place lately, but isn't Obama competing for being a president again?

This is a new dynamic (presidential race). Many of us on the ground have been holding our breaths. There has been a funereal depression. Suddenly we can breathe. Nobody knows anything about Harris, really. She hasn't been one of those visible vice presidents. Biden didn't do for her what Obama did for Biden. Obama gave Biden a highly visible role in which the VP seemed to be very effective. Harris has been largely behind the curtain. Look past her race and her gender. That's not the formula. She was a very effective prosecutor...so effective that when she ran in the primary against Biden progressives discounted her. She was too tough on crime. She has been a senator. In that role, she handled herself skillfully. She has been vice president. Over the last four years her public speaking skills have matured. She is highly articulate. Thinks on her feet. Put her up against a rambling, vituperative Trump and she will look very, very good.

Add to all of that the issues. Trump's tax policies favor the wealthy, not the middle class. His tariff proposal would be highly inflationary. He was a union buster. He, and he alone is responsible for the Dobbs decision. He has promised to be a dictator, take us out of NATO (or at least neuter NATO). He is pro big pharma. He wants to gut the Affordable Health Care plan. I won't go on. All Harris has to do is make clear the differences. Now that big ticket donors are back in the Democratic fold, she will be able to do what Biden couldn't do.

There is an enormous amount of enthusiasm for this candidacy among the base. It is an enthusiasm that will match Trump's base, without the religious (that is cultist) fervor of his MAGA followers.

Can't wait for that debate. I'm guessing he won't have the nerve to go up against her. He is going to beg off, claiming he promised to debate Biden, not Harris.

These are just a few of my friendly thoughts in response to your post and comments I've read here.

Hope you all have a great day.

I doubt he even wrote that or even knows he is out.

The Value Plan, as it stands, seems to be a one-sided relationship with the HIVE platform, where the benefits are one-way. It's akin to a one-sided friendship, where one party continuously takes without giving back.

The issues of downvotes and the farming situation on HIVE are significant concerns that need to be addressed, those with more power, are creating an imbalance in the community. The genuine HIVE community, which values fairness and equality, do not support such practices most are afraid to speak up. However, the current structure appears to be enabling these bad activities, making it challenging to bring about change.

The misuse of power and the squandering of HIVE funds on trash are concerning. These actions not only undermine the integrity of HIVE but also dishearten the genuine community members who are committed to its growth and development.

If one is backing this 'trashy' plan, they are, directly or indirectly, contributing to the problems on HIVE. It's crucial to understand that every action has a consequence, and supporting such plans can lead to a further imbalance in the community will lead to a lower HIVE PRICE LESS USERS. Instead, it would be more beneficial to focus on promoting fairness, transparency, and real community-driven development.

When Biden stepped down, I read a tweet saying Trump has a greater chance of winning the election now that Kamala
is his contender . We'll see about that I guess!!

Congratulations @edicted! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You received more than 168000 HP as payout for your posts, comments and curation. Your next payout target is 170000 HP. The unit is Hive Power equivalent because post and comment rewards can be split into HP and HBD

_{You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP}

Just a stark reminder of our complete and utter reliance on centralization and how systemic failure is much more possible than it should be.

Well this is suppose to be a decentralized chain yet I can post comments and up vote post but I can't post articles I write. Apparently, or it looks like, someone hacked into my hive keychain, or at least there's a set of keys in there that aren't mine. I never got around to putting my keys in there. So decentralization sucks just as much as centralization, especially when somehow no one knows how to recover my account.

With that said, I left you a comment last night but ended up deleting it after it wouldn't post. Thought it was the start of something else wrong with my account but I guess it wasn't. I've never seen you at a loss for words, especially humorous ones. I think a lot of people really don't see what's been at play here and they really think it matters who gets in office. The reality is this whole political prosecution thing was staged from the beginning. Back in 2017 a guy named James Sherk, a domestic council member under Trump, wanted to find a way to take what he called a constitutional theory that presidents have immunity up to the SC to test it. It was also in 2017 that Liz Cheney decide to hop onto the political bandwagon and ran for office. But this wasn't really about immunity for presidents, this was all about immunity for the executive branch. Reason why was in case of the possibility that something would backfire in the covid scam and vaccine of things. Liz vested interest in playing along to help build a string of political prosecutions would be to protect her dad, who served under Bush as VP where gain of function on corona virus started. Now, with five states getting ready to sue the pharmaceutical companies, it appears their fears were warranted. Instead of write the whole thing out again, I wrote the majority of it in a comment on anther blog site earlier today, to see how it's all run down, just ignore the first few sentences as it's more on topic to the discussion there but the rest is more specific to what I wanted to say last night.

Will only happen now if the evidence comes from outside the executive branch of government. All that evidence has been destroyed. So at this point, it's never going to happen. Unless some underling wants to become a whistle blower that gives them the smoking gun. Reason is because the presidential immunity thing wasn't just about Trump, as many are misled to believe, as usual. The basis of the SC ruling was on executive branch members being able to function unfettered by the fear of prosecution. They all have immunity now. Everyone, including Fauci. Up to and including anyone, like big Pharma, conversations with executive branch members can't come within the scope of the executive branch conducted business with big pharma. Now, if someone within big pharma has a smoking gun of proof whereas they or it wasn't connected to conversations/documents with the executive branch, and that proof shows obvious egregious behavior outside the authority of the executive branch to have been conducted, than and only than can they compel the executive branch to hand over any documents/transcripts of conversations recorded on the subject matter to verify it warrants prosecution of executive branch members.

Now part two will be coming soon to a theater near you. That will be the documents case, if it unfolds like I think it will, and Meese's Amicus Curiae gets removed as a Writ and introduced as a friend of the court advisory brief, what will transpire is the SC picking it apart to come up with what is being labeled as "modernization for todays times" special council authority. Of which, pay special attention to the cases Meese picked to be a "friend of the court" advisor on the matter. Within that you'll find, in the end, that, if I am right, all the underlings in the executive branch will get protected by immunity from prosecution. Guys, like, ones who carry documents around Mar A Lago at the behest of their executive branch head honchos'. But, if Meese's AC isn't introduced into the documents case, which is coming up on appeal, and is let stand as a Writ, meaning a case to be heard before the end of the SC term n Sept, expect the same result for the underlings. In that regard, it will take the same thing as above to convict any underling of wrong doing, the evidence will have to exist outside the executive that is compelling enough to sit the underling down and threaten him with 20 years if he doesn't talk.

That's why Trump can sit at the end of this conversation in the video, and say off the cuff stuff like tell me this is our last election, because, moving forward, as the way they are setting this up, right under your nose, is that the executive branch, or our government if you want to say, will no longer be held accountable for their actions to the American people unless first the American people can prove without a doubt, that something obviously egregious has occurred outside the scope of executive authority to have done.
Will only happen now if the evidence comes from outside the executive branch of government. All that evidence has been destroyed. So at this point, it's never going to happen. Unless some underling wants to become a whistle blower that gives them the smoking gun. Reason is because the presidential immunity thing wasn't just about Trump, as many are misled to believe, as usual. The basis of the SC ruling was on executive branch members being able to function unfettered by the fear of prosecution. They all have immunity now. Everyone, including Fauci. Up to and including anyone, like big Pharma, conversations with executive branch members can't come within the scope of the executive branch conducted business with big pharma. Now, if someone within big pharma has a smoking gun of proof whereas they or it wasn't connected to conversations/documents with the executive branch, and that proof shows obvious egregious behavior outside the authority of the executive branch to have been conducted, than and only than can they compel the executive branch to hand over any documents/transcripts of conversations recorded on the subject matter to verify it warrants prosecution of executive branch members.

Now part two will be coming soon to a theater near you. That will be the documents case, if it unfolds like I think it will, and Meese's Amicus Curiae gets removed as a Writ and introduced as a friend of the court advisory brief, what will transpire is the SC picking it apart to come up with what is being labeled as "modernization for todays times" special council authority. Of which, pay special attention to the cases Meese picked to be a "friend of the court" advisor on the matter. Within that you'll find, in the end, that, if I am right, all the underlings in the executive branch will get protected by immunity from prosecution. Guys, like, ones who carry documents around Mar A Lago at the behest of their executive branch head honchos'. But, if Meese's AC isn't introduced into the documents case, which is coming up on appeal, and is let stand as a Writ, meaning a case to be heard before the end of the SC term n Sept, expect the same result for the underlings. In that regard, it will take the same thing as above to convict any underling of wrong doing, the evidence will have to exist outside the executive that is compelling enough to sit the underling down and threaten him with 20 years if he doesn't talk.

That's why Trump can sit at the end of this conversation in the video, and say off the cuff stuff like tell me this is our last election, because, moving forward, as the way they are setting this up, right under your nose, is that the executive branch, or our government if you want to say, will no longer be held accountable for their actions to the American people unless first the American people can prove without a doubt, that something obviously egregious has occurred outside the scope of executive authority to have done.

this is gonna be a tight one, let's see how it goes 🤔