RE: PAULINE HANSON’S TWEET PROSECUTION: A THREAT TO FREE SPEECH
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
LOL Oh I see .. So, according to this line of reasoning, instructing someone to do something is now being equated with violence? It seems to me that when a discussion descends to such a level of absurdity, it’s best to step away. I believe this conversation has reached that point, and I must respectfully withdraw. With all the violence I can muster,...
Go back to school and read a book.
0
0
0.000
All orders have an implied threat of violence for non compliance. If you don't understand that, maybe you should take your own advice and head back to school.
Expressing an opinion is not an order. There's nothing lower in debate than obfuscating language to make an erroneous argument which you've clearly done here.
I would say projection attacks are lower, and that's clearly what you've done here.
Just my opinion on the order of things at the bottom.