NATO is dead. But NATO zombie still dreams of attacking Russia…

Four years ago, this would be a breaking news 💥: Chairman of the Alliance’s Military Committee, Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, gave a statement, cited by the Financial Times, that NATO is considering a ‘preventive strike’ on Russia. “‘Preventive strike’ could be considered ‘defensive action’”, he emphasized.

Today, this news is irellevant, like everything coming from the NATO & EU. I am going to explain this, after you see this excellent 26 min. long CrossTalk by Peter Lavelle, with Patrick Henningsen and Tarik Cyril Amar:

“With the frontlines collapsing, domestic political insecurity and claims of massive corruption at the highest level, the Kiev regime is on unsteady ground. Its survival is in question. Add to this the struggle to make peace or continue the war. Can Zelensky survive all this?”

There are – in my humble opinion – three key points of this CrossTalk, which give deep insight into the current situation of the clash between NATO and Russia:

• Patrick Henningsen: In the West, it is political suicide to address the root causes
• Tarik Cyril Amar: Russia is predictable, Trump’s Administration isn’t
• Peter Lavelle: Russia is giving off-ramp to the West… in vain

All three points lead to a picture of a ‘Gambler raising stakes as loses everything in complete denial that Ukraine lost despite full USA, NATO & EU support’… With aditional point – this gambler don’t even have any cards!

Let’s start with the first, Henningsen’s point. The West still doesn’t want to hear those two words: ‘Root causes’ – because that would indeed necessarily mean political suicide and the disappearance of the provocateur of all those causes – the NATO pact!

The balloon has been inflated to bursting for a quarter of a century. Fortunately, EU & NATO are all bark and no bite. They no longer have any military power. Hubris has turned them into a sterile bureaucratic structure. The US has understood that the complete and catastrophic military defeat of NATO and EU institutions is inevitable, and therefore they are getting away with the story of ‘impartial peace mediators’. Despite the reality and the chances to get out of the war frenzy, which Russia constantly offers them (Lavel’s point), they persistently treat these well-intentioned proposals as – weakness!

And so we come to Tariq Cyril Amar’s point: The Russians are predictable, they want peace. Britain and the EU are predictable, they want war. The only unpredictable side is the US! Britain and the EU want the US to fight Russia alongside them. The US wants Britain and the EU to fight Russia without them.

So what will happen if the psychopathic association decides to launch some major provocation? People often ask me: “How long this war will last?” And I say without hesitation: “Four years and 15 minutes!” Four years, because that's how long it usually takes the Russians to complete what they’ve planned (this time in Ukraine), and 15 minutes – because that’s how long it takes Oreshnik to fly to all the key military targets in Europe! This is how the EU would finally realize Klaus Schwab’s dream of 15-minute cities!

If NATO cannot wage direct war against Russia, and they need war more than ever, what can they do about it? There has never been a shortage of insidious ideas in the West, and one of them is to keep Russia in a constant state of war until it is economically ruined. How will it do that? As always, by causing complete chaos. By causing conflict where Russia cannot remain indifferent. For example, on our Helm.

They call it “Burning the platform”…