RE: The Latin American Report # 564
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Hello, my friend. The Haitian crisis is highly complex. Now I’m thinking about how certain initiatives that initially seem aligned with what we’ve long discussed—i.e., people preparing and acquiring the means, or more plainly, weapons, to defend themselves—have later devolved into criminal organizations just as harmful, if not worse, than the threats they sought to counter. For example, I’m reminded of the so-called self-defense groups that have emerged in Haiti itself and other countries like Colombia, where collectives of citizens, fed up with the inability of official security forces, have adopted their own structures and measures to respond to threats to their safety. Though I believe your suggestion, broadly speaking, has always been that each individual should have unrestricted access to the means to overcome the inherent vulnerability of being unarmed in a ruthless world. I surely believe this is a great deterrent factor.
Yet In Ecuador, former President Lasso relaxed regulations on this issue, but seemingly without much success (at the same time, could this kind of initiative increase the legal supply channels for criminals?). Related to this, I also reflect on something that has been pointed out in this matter: even if we are armed, criminals still have the advantage of the "surprise factor." In Haiti’s case, I think the constitution at least permits armed self-defense within the home, if not carrying weapons publicly—though, in a controversial move, authorities there like to impose a ban when security tensions rise go, so people are prohibited from carrying weapons precisely when they seem to need them most.
Regarding Argentina, I agree with your perspective. As always, thank you for your insightful feedback, my friend.
It is sometimes not enough to have authority to be armed recognized by government. The poor often can barely afford food, and fine weapons are far too expensive. This is why I lament the women and children of Haiti aren't being armed by governments that can afford it. Clearly sending in some troops isn't working.
It is true that communities that are unable to count on some government or other will often simply band together to provide their security, and since this is how governments are created, they can become a gang, or government, whichever term you prefer. They're the same thing in practice.
It is always good to have your perspective on matters. You are encyclopedic regarding the Americas, and I always benefit from your posts.
You are being too generous, saying I am encyclopedic on this, but I try to give my best. Thanks always for your kind feedback, my friend.