Review sites are so full of crap - especially when politics are involved
Do anything remotely political and watch the review bombing begin. That is what has recently happened with Melania, a documentary film sort of thing that I didn't intend to watch, until the maniacs decided to get into the comments section and write a review for something that I am certain that 95% of the people in there haven't even watched.

src
Regardless of how a person feels about her husband, I think that a story of someone coming from her background, learning a bunch languages, becoming successful as a model while also staying clean and not letting the industry corrupt her, obtaining citizenship, and then becoming the first lady of the most powerful country in the world, twice, is a pretty interesting topic. However, I likely wouldn't know even known this was released had it not been for all the nastiness that has surrounded its release.

src
There is zero chance these people watched the film and it just goes to show how absolutely insane people are about politics. Why hate on Melania? Why try to trash her film? Also, the free publicity all of this is garnering is going to encourage the people who absolutely love Donald Trump to go out and see this when they perhaps wouldn't have bothered to do so before now.
Looking over at the other popular review site, we get a similarly stupid result but in the opposite direction

When we make a few clicks we get to see what the results are for the "unverified audience" and it tells another story entirely.

src
What this says to me is that there are tens of thousands of crazy people out there that took time out of their day to go and sign up in order to leave a bogus review of someone that they really hate. I think there are a lot of people out there with mental problems for sure.
But this isn't a political post guys, I stay away from all of that shite. I likely will watch this though because I kind of would like to know her backstory. She is not the president after all and seems like a genuinely kind and intelligent person She's also stunningly beautiful and I think that is just an objective fact. She has an unusual look at that likely made her a model in the first place.
I recall in the past that when something that hadn't even been released yet got review bombed like this, the review sites would overhaul the results or change the results or pause voting or something like that. I wonder why they didn't do that this time... lol.
I was most upset about a film called 28 Years Later which I thought was a steaming pile of doo doo. It was so filled with holes and was just not very good. It was the biggest letdown of last year but this project, which is a planned trilogy, was totally protected by the media who would all stray away from being even remotely critical of it. Reviews were scrubbed and rigged and a "weighted score" was used to ensure that the 6-7/10 remained intact. We are seeing the same thing happen with the latest version of that trilogy that I am so uninterested in I don't even remember the name of it.
I don't think it is at all a secret that the review sites simply cannot be trusted. They have agendas and especially when it comes to something political, there are a lot of crazies out there that somehow think that they are doing something virtuous by ripping a film a new one en masse when it probably ends up having the opposite effect and now more people are going to go and see it than originally would have if the reviewers had just been honest and said something like "I didn't watch it and I never will because I am a crazy person that makes everything in my life political even though I am miserable because of it!"
I watch a lot of stuff that is rated poorly on both IMDB and RT and end up really enjoying many of the films and shows. The opposite is also true where something has really high marks and I find it to be trivial garbage. These review sites were always going to get corrupted, you are better off reading what someone has to say here IMO.
We are spoiled for choice these days but I think one thing is true and that is that the review sites are, and likely always were, rigged. The dead internet theory is a good one and maybe there is a movie out there about that. That's something me and 100,000 bots could all watch together!
Some might wonder why the director, Brett Ratner, hasn't really done anything since 2017
I haven't bothered to look into any of it. I'll likely watch it though just because of the controversy, which might have been the goal from the start. All press is good press I guess.
Is there some sketchy information about Brett Ratner?
Caste he got “Me Too’d”. A accusation which fell apart btw and had no credibility. I say good on him getting a chance to direct again after falling victim to a mob making baseless accusations decades later and ruining peoples lives with just a single accusation and zero evidence or credibility.
It could simply be a puff-piece for a friend of a friend... but there are a lot of coincidences. Not too sure I'd leap in to his defense lol
The film was not even released in South Africa and was blocked by the distributors. I think politics should be up to your own choice and whether good or bad you should not force your opinions on others and this should have been released.
well I am sure that the people who made it are not all that worried about it. The overall budget was pretty large though, I remember reading that it was over $50 million even though most of it is stock footage and interviews.
This is nothing new. My necks of the woods is experiencing the same phenomenon since 1990s with films that deal with "interesting times" or even present day when they touch some sensitive topics. Review bombing on IMDb, based on ethnicity, nationality, ideology and whoever side your grandfather supported in WW2 became the thing a decade before Facebook and tody's social networks.
Posted using CineTV
I bet it happens with a lot of things. I see that Sidney Sweeney's films are still review bombed presumably because of the manufactured "crisis" over the jeans ad. Really stupid people exist in the world now. I think she is a good actress.
Nice seeing a post discussing this that not just “Orange Man Bad” & “Trump is Literally Hitler”
It’s just lazy and sadly it’s quite all I’m seeing on Hive lately, nothing wrong with criticism of Trump admin policy or action, but instead irs just this fake narrative that corruption & everything bad only started when Trump took office. Anyway my long winded way of saying it’s nice to get a fair non ridicule bias take here!
I even had many hive friends unfollow & mute me for just saying it’s lazy to say everything ever is Trumps fault. Just guess I expected slightly better informed takes on a decentralized platform than say Facebook. Oh well.