Multi-Tiered Society – Part 1: Engineered Two-Tiered Society

Hi Everyone,

One of the most prominent pieces of propaganda circulating in Western media is that the West operates on a two-tier system. This relates to Government policy, the justice system, and the actions of certain groups. Different media define the preferred groups differently. ‘Left-wing’ media and activists claim that minorities are discriminated against. This discrimination is based on race, religion, gender, sexuality, and transgender ideology. ‘Right-wing’ media and activists claim the opposite. They claim that minorities are favoured over the majority.

Western countries do not have two-tier systems. They have multi-tiered systems. The concept of the two-tiered system supports the divide-and-conquer strategy. Divide-and-conquer strategies work best when people are divided into just two opposing groups. The two-tiered system is dividing society in line with ‘left-wing’ and ‘right-wing’ politics.

In Part 1, I discuss both the ‘left-wing’ and ‘right-wing’ versions of the two-tiered system that the Establishment want the two sides of their fake political spectrum to believe.

‘Left-Wing’ Two-tier Version

---

Historically, the context of the ‘left-wing’ claim has merit. In the previous century, racism was rampant against minority races in many Western countries, such as the US and Germany. In the earlier half of the previous century, women were not given the same freedom and rights as men. Homosexuals were considered lesser than heterosexuals; they faced direct and systemic abuse. Muslims faced discrimination when entering the US based on grounds of incompatible culture. They faced further discrimination after the 911 attacks in 2001. Transgender ideology is only a recent political construct. However, men who cross-dressed faced discrimination.

All of the above groups still face discrimination, but not in the historical context described by the ‘left-wing’ media and activists. The discrimination these groups face is predominantly a product of ‘left-wing’ policy. Meritocracy, if applied correctly, discriminates based on factors such as achievement, ability, best fit, and value added. Race, class, religion, gender, and sexuality play no direct role.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

---

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies work contrary to meritocratic practices. They discriminate directly based on race, religion, or gender to create the impression of fairness by creating a representative distribution. This raises the bar for groups that have typically dominated in a particular area and lows the bar for groups that are less represented in a meritocratic system. It hurts those from the previously 'over-represented' groups because they miss out. It hurts those from the previously 'under-represented' groups because there is no motivation for them to raise their standards. It hurts the institution or company recruiting them because they are lowering their overall standards.

There are many possible reasons why some groups are more represented based on meritocracy. These reasons could be related to some form of disadvantage, such as poverty, negative aspects of particular cultures, or unstable family background. If disadvantage is a reason for under-representation, it should be dealt with more directly, as under-representation, in these cases, is merely a symptom of other problems. Other reasons could relate to areas of interest or innate abilities. These reasons do not need to be dealt with at all.

Feminism

---

Feminism is fundamentally a ‘left-wing’ driven concept. It is promoted as creating equality between men and women. This argument has appealed to many women and even men. However, it is built on a false premise. Men and women are not equal. They differ in many ways. They tend to succeed in different areas and different environments. Overall, that does mean one sex is superior to the other. It means they are different and complementary to each other.

Feminist ideology downplays traditional female roles, which are often unpaid, such as taking care of the home and looking after children. It promotes traditional male roles, which typically involve paid roles that occur outside the family. This is discrimination against traditional women’s roles, which is discrimination against women’s long-held identity, which is discrimination against women. Feminism has increased discrimination against women as well as lowered the quality of women’s lives.

Feminism has been used as a tool to manipulate women into pursuing fulltime jobs outside of the family. This has led to a few notable negative consequences.

The increase in the supply of available workforce has contributed to stifling wage growth. This has arguably played a role in preventing wages from rising as quickly as improved productivity. This hurts both men and women. See figures below using statistics from the US.

Source: Economic Policy Institute

Source: Our World in Data
Note: Once women’s participation stopped increasing, around 2000, hourly wages began to rise after flatlining for almost three decades.

The increase in the number of women in fulltime employment has harmed the family unit. It has led to a reduction in the number of marriages and a fall in the birth rate.

The absence of both parents from the home has led to an increase in neglect of children. This neglect is compounded by the shift from the extended family structure to the nuclear family structure. Children are taken care of by paid help, spend more time at school, or are left to take care of themselves. See figures below for birth rates and marriage rates in the US.

Source: Our World in Data

Source: Our World in Data

The change in the roles of women has created more tension between men and women. Women’s presence in the workplace has influenced workplace cultures. This has forced men to interact differently as well as become more cautious in their actions and language. If women become more successful at work than the men do, whether that is through merit or DEI, the men could become resentful.

Spending more time at work means less time for chores. This creates tension over who should be doing these chores and in what proportion. Many men will be reluctant because they see these chores as typical women’s work. The women will become resentful if they have to do all the work despite working long hours like the men.

Feminism could have had a useful place in society if it focused on equal opportunity instead of equality. It should recognise the value in all roles played by men and women, instead of treating men’s roles as superior. It should promote freedom and choice, instead of pushing women towards the workforce and employment. Some cultures (e.g., Thailand, Poland, and Nigeria) encourage women to run small businesses. This gives them considerably more flexibility between work and family time.

Read more about the above points in my series, The Subjugation of Femininity and the Mirage of Sex Equality.

Transgenderism

---

The biggest victims of ‘left-wing’ policy and rhetoric are the transgender community.

Terminology such as gender is designed to confuse people. The word ‘gender’ was meant as an alternative word to ‘sex’ to distinguish males and females and not to be mistaken for sexual intercourse (Grammarphobia).

However, 'gender' is also being used to describe characteristics and roles associated with being male or female. Most arguments over gender are caused by confusion around the definition.

Some people suffer from sex dysphoria (technically gender dysphoria based on the earlier definition of gender). They believe they have been placed in the wrong body. A man might strongly believe he should have been born a woman, and a woman might strongly believe she should have been born a man. This leads to some of them believing they can identify as the opposite sex and expect to be accepted by others as that sex.

Sex dysphoria is a psychological disorder and can cause considerable suffering and distress. Main mainstream psychology and psychiatry have abandoned efforts to cure this disorder (Lumen). Instead, they indulge in the patients’ delusion that they are the opposite sex. They even recommend life-changing hormone treatments and, in some cases, surgery. This is to help give them the appearance of their sex. By doing this, it raises their expectations of being treated as if they were their desired sex. Many in society do not accept them as their desired sex. This leads to even more suffering and distress.

People who identify as the opposite sex are referred to in society as transgender. Transgender advocates, who are typically ‘left-leaning’ people, want transgender people to be recognised by society as their desired sex and their rights to be interpreted the same as people of that biological sex.

This has brought a lot of attention to transgender people. Some people see being transgender as trendy, which has attracted more people adopting a transgender lifestyle even though they do not suffer from sex dysphoria. Another dangerous development is that transgender movements have merged with gay rights movements and, in some cases, even hijacked them. Sexuality and sex identity are two very different concepts.

The most worrying development is that transgender ideology is spilling over to children. Some parents believe that because their children do not conform to gender stereotypes, they might have been born in the wrong bodies. This idea is placed into children’s heads, and they then believe that to be the case. This has led to life-changing treatments that ruin these children’s lives.

‘Right-Wing’ Two-tier Version

---

'Right-wing' media and activists simplistically describe DEI as discrimination against native Europeans, whom they describe as ‘White’ people. They simplistically describe feminism as harmful to men with minimal discussion of the harm to women. This perpetuates the ‘them vs us’ divide with limited broader perspective of consequences to all involved.

Minority Favouritism

---

A key focus of ‘right-wing’ media and activists has been direct favouritism shown to minority groups by the Government. For example, minorities are often perceived to be favoured in policing (i.e., treated less aggressively), favoured by courts (i.e., given lighter sentences), favoured in receipt of benefits (i.e., elevated on housing waiting lists), and favoured in receiving access to medical treatment (i.e., they are allowed to skip queues in hospitals because they need an interpreter).

The above claims are true to a certain extent. The ‘right-wing’ media and activists provide plenty and frequent examples of the above claims. They have adequately demonstrated that the Government show favouritism to certain minorities, and this is prevalent across much of the UK. The most notable example is the lack of prosecution of Pakistani grooming. For decades, UK women have been subject to rape and sexual assault from gangs of men from predominantly Pakistani backgrounds. This has caused considerable outrage among people who follow ‘right-leaning’ media, while many on the ‘left’ are in denial over these events because it does not suit their narrative (New English Review).

The ‘left-wing’ activists are able to counter the claims of the ‘right-wing’ activists by citing examples of discrimination that still occur against minorities.

The ‘right-wing’ media and activists focus the blame on the minority groups rather than the Government. They label the Government as weak or afraid of being labelled as racist or discriminatory against groups that have historically faced discrimination. The minorities are being blamed for exploiting the Government and the system.

The minorities are not to blame. The 'left-wing' media and activists, NGOs and even academics have exploited them. They have continuously fed the idea into minorities’ heads that they are the victims. They push the ideology that native Europeans (White people) are inherently racist and look down on them.

The ‘right-wing’ media and activists go to great length to turn native European people against minorities. On top of blaming them for bad Government policy and action, they also attack other countries that do not share Western-style democratic values. They treat their Governments and people as threats. They often claim that legal immigrants are acting malevolently on behalf of their countries in an attempt to bring down Western countries.

In reality, illegal immigrants are mostly in Western countries because their countries have been devastated by the actions of Western Governments (e.g., sanctions and puppet leaders) and because of the vastly improved quality of life Western Governments are offering illegal immigrants at the expense of Western taxpayers.

Eventually ‘right-wing’ propaganda influences people to dislike and even act against minorities, immigrants in particular. This perpetuates the fears of the minorities.

Hence, tensions continue to grow between the ‘left-leaning’ people who support the minorities and the ‘right-leaning’ people who believe the minorities are a threat to them. This is a divide-and-conquer strategy orchestrated by the Establishment using both ‘left-wing’ and 'right-wing' activists.

The two-tier system is a facade. The currently predominantly ‘left-leaning’ European Union and UK Governments will continue to show favouritism towards minorities. This is not because they actually favour them, but simply to cause tensions between them and their ‘right-leaning’ citizens.

Some countries will replace their ‘left-wing’ Governments with ‘right-wing’ Governments. This has occurred in the US, with the election of Donald Trump. To a certain extent, some of the favouritism has been reversed, but because individual states control their own policies, this has not been across the whole country. Trump’s most important role has been foreign policy (see my posts, The Left Right Left Right March Intensifies and Strait of Hormuz and the Iran War – Part 2: Reasons for War and the Bigger Agenda).

Most European countries have more centralised domestic governance than the US. When some of them switch to ‘right-wing’ Governments, we are likely to see favouritism in favour of minorities, immigrants in particular, change to discrimination against them. This is unlikely to occur in a sufficient number of countries for the EU to change their policies in a meaningful way before mass migration rapidly increases in the coming years as a result of the war in Iran (see my post, Strait of Hormuz and the Iran War – Part 2: Reasons for War and the Bigger Agenda).

Continues in Part 2.

---

The Sapien Loop Series

I have written a trilogy of books titled Sapien Loop. The first in the series is Sapien Loop: End of an Era, the second is Sapien Loop: Frozen in Time, and the third is Sapien Loop: Worlds Collide. I published the whole series as ebooks on Amazon, and I have posted completed chapters to my @captainhive

In 2025, I wrote a short stories book about some of the characters and their adventures. This book is now available on Amazon. I have also posted these stories to my @captainhive account.

Brief Summary of Sapien Loop: End of an Era

This story is based on the fictional planet Sapia and its sole country, Sapey. Sapey is portrayed as a form of utopia for all its citizens. No poverty. No war. Almost no crime. Opportunities for all.

This was enough for most citizens, but not all. In one of the small regions, some of the citizens had become discontent. They felt something important was missing in their lives. Their discontent did not go unnoticed. Some of the Sapey elite wanted to weaponise this discontent to gain more power. This created more chaos than they anticipated. This led to further widespread social unrest.

On top of the chaos, ambition and greed provoked another enemy. This enemy was on a mission to settle both new and old scores.

Brief Summary of Sapien Loop: Frozen in Time

This story is based six years after the original story. The Downs Region is still suffering from a serious health crisis caused by the contaminated water. The main characters are desperately trying to find a cure for the illness that has been caused by the water.

One of the main characters has discovered frozen humanoids in hidden chambers. It appears they have been frozen for a long time. These chambers connect to a vast network of tunnels. While exploring the tunnels, one of the frozen humanoids disappears. It appears he has been stolen.

The story takes a step back in time to tell the story of the frozen humanoids. How and why were they frozen? This part of the story also explains the fall of ancient Sapey and the birth of the Sapiens. Can those from the past be able to coexist with those from the present?

Brief Summary of Sapien Loop: Worlds Collide

Sapien Loop: Worlds Collide continues the story directly after the events of the second book. Orcilla and Yassmay continue their journey to find help. In doing so, they encounter a dissident group from the underground world.

Tiberius is secured as the puppet leader for the underground Linap. He is being used to control the surface world from the Downs Region. Tiberius is unhappy with this arrangement and desires to be fully in control.

Resistance has formed to take back the Downs Region from Tiberius and the underground Linap. They aim to turn the underground population against Tiberius. If that fails, their only hope is to join forces with the dissident group Orcilla and Yassmay encountered.

All worlds may be destined to collide. Will Sapey finally be free of tyranny, is it destined to be destroyed, or is it locked into another loop of oppression?

Hive: Future of Social Media

Spectrumecons on the Hive Blockchain