Rumble in the White House
Dear Hiveans,
this Monday I wrote an exam, so I was quite busy over the last weeks. The events in the White House last week didn't escape me though. As there seems to be little nuance concerning this topic, here my thoughts about that.
Dear Europeans and Americans, feel free to feel offended!
https://images.hive.blog/1400x220/
1. Europe, shame on you!
The Europeans and all allies of the USA made big mistakes over the last 35 years:
- far too little defense spending (relative to their GDP; 2% should be the goal), source
- too little contribution to the US war efforts regarding Afghanistan and Iraq (for good or bad), and the ridiculous public shaming of the US by Chirac and Schröder (source) while the US freed the world from a dictator (Saddam).
- too high (partially hidden) tariffs towards the US and the world
- Europe celebrating a party, redistributing money to all kinds of socialist endeavours while freeriding the US defense umbrella
- Europe (with an unbearable smug attitude) moralising and telling other countries what to do and what not to do
In my opinion Americans saw that, had some harsh experiences in those wars (with many dead and high costs) and felt being abandoned/betrayed. And now many of them are fed up, and don't want to fight the wars of others. I can understand that.
That's one reason why Trump was elected in the first place (both 2016 and 2024). He tries to "correct" that (or says to do that).
Trump being Trump is not doing that via diplomatic means (though Vance called him chief diplomat), but via such open "talks".
--> Europe disqualified itself as a serious and trusted partner.
I wrote more about Europe, in 2020 and 2022.
2. Americans, you can (and will) do better.
Rhetorically Trump is an appeaser, and if he would follow up on that, that would be very, very bad for the whole world.
Here some basic facts regarding the Ukraine War:
- Russia/Putin started an unprovoked war by invading Ukraine (in February 2022, actually already in 2014).
- Putin has broken every contract he had previously signed. Thus, without security guarantees, a ceasefire/peace agreement with Putin is worth nothing. It's delusional to think a peace deal with Putin will be honored by him.
- Zelensky is not a dictator, but a democratically elected leader of a sovereign country. And he is a hero. Other leaders would have fled Ukraine in February 2022 (as did Yanukovych, wiki).
- If Ukraine (like Israel) lays down their weapons, Ukrainians are annihilated. If Russia (like Hamas) lay down their weapons, there will be peace.
During the talks in the White House, Zelenskyy could have "performed" better and should not have interrupted his hosts. But after three years of war, he is scarred by these experiences (countless war crimes against his people) and tired of lies spread about his persona (dictator, guilt of war, drug abuse) and just pissed because of the insufficient support.
When Zelensky correctly pointed out that the US are profiting from nice oceans protecting them from invasion (very hypothetical side question: how would World War 2 have evolved if there was no Atlantic ocean between France and the US?) and that nonetheless the US may feel the brunt of war in the future, things escalated quite a bit. I hope he's wrong, but perhaps Zelensky's words will be seen as prophetic some years from now. Appeasing an aggressor like Putin shows other dictators that the rules-based order is done, and that they may profit from attacking other countries, without severe consequences.
The US have a (perhaps not legal, but moral) duty to protect Ukraine as promised when Ukraine gave up its nuclear bombs (as Secretary of State Rubio says here). And Trump inherited this duty. He should not renege on this.
Trump and Vance attacked the guy that is fighting a vicious war for the survival of his people, wrongfully claiming that he doesn't even say thank you (proof) or that he "let the war happen". How emotionally insecure a man must be, to demand a "thank you" or "sorry"? A "sorry" or "thank you" that does not come naturally, is worth nothing.
Attacking a man who is fighting for the survival of his people and country while you are
- in your own country
- in your own castle / White House
- speaking in your own language
- surrounded by your own cronies and media
- in a position of military and economic strength
… is displaying your own weakness. This was the weakest moment of Trump and Vance I have seen up to now.
What we saw was the political right's version of Greta's ridiculous "how dare you":
- Greta grew up in Sweden, one of the richest and most comfortable environments that ever existed on this planet and has the chuzpe / impudence to make demands towards society (that, if followed up upon, would lead to poor countries staying poor).
- Trump and Vance live in the strongest, most secure and overall capital-richest country in the world, a country that has a fantastic historical record, from establishing a republic with democratic elements, the abolition of slavery, defeating the Nazis, establishing the Marshall plan, defeating the Soviets and much more. Nonetheless Trump and Vance react immaturely and thin-skinned when confronted by facts and by the expectation to honor their commitment to secure Ukraine.
Here more about the "woke right".
3. What's next?
Europe has to step up and rearm immensely. That will cost a lot (financed by debt, of course) which will increase inflation. And inflation is the ultimate driver of populism and extremism. Beware, Europe!
In the short- to medium-term these developments may benefit (relatively) the US, as they can reduce and refocus military expenditures.
The challenge for Europe will either break the EU or it will lead to European countries coming together to tackle and (partly or mostly) solve their myriad problems.
I don't know Trump's real intentions. I tend to believe that he is not a Russian asset (that would be like the tail wags the dog) and think or hope that this is just his kind of negotiating (the Art of the Deal): first applying maximum pressure on the EU to step up and rearm and on Zelensky to force him to accept (any?) peace deal, second Trump negotiates with Putin also applying maximum pressure and finally getting to a peace deal. Then Trump is celebrated as a peace deal maker and gets the Nobel Peace Prize, so that he feels better when barbecueing with his buddy Obama.
As I am an avid reader of history, I've always asked myself how it was living through turbulent times like the French or American Revolutions or 1914-1945. Now I am experiencing the breeze of such a dramatic time.
Stay safe, Слава Україні! / Slava Ukraini , and have a great day,
zuerich
Memes and thoughts...
Liebe Hiver,
am Montag hatte ich eine Prüfung, war also in den letzten Wochen ziemlich beschäftigt. Die Ereignisse im Weißen Haus letzte Woche sind mir aber nicht entgangen. Da es anscheinend wenig Nuancen zu diesem Thema gibt, hier meine Gedanken dazu.
Liebe Europäer und Amerikaner, Ihr dürft Euch gerne beleidigt fühlen!
1. Europa, schäme dich!
Die Europäer und alle Verbündeten der USA haben in den letzten 35 Jahren große Fehler gemacht:
- viel zu geringe Verteidigungsausgaben (im Verhältnis zum BIP; 2% sollten das Ziel sein), Quelle
- zu geringer Beitrag zu den Kriegsanstrengungen der USA in Bezug auf Afghanistan und den Irak (ob gut oder schlecht) und die lächerliche öffentliche Beschämung der USA durch Chirac und Schröder (Quelle), während die USA die Welt von einem Diktator (Saddam) befreit haben.
- zu hohe (teilweise versteckte) Zölle gegenüber den USA und der Welt
- Europa feiert eine sozialistische Umverteilungsorgie, verteilt Geld sonstwohin und wird von den USA subventioniert (per US-Verteidigungsschirm über Europa)
- Europa (mit einer unerträglichen Selbstgefälligkeit) moralisiert und sagt anderen Ländern, was sie zu tun und zu lassen haben
Meiner Meinung nach sahen die Amerikaner das, machten in diesen Kriegen harte Erfahrungen (mit vielen Toten und hohen Kosten) und fühlten sich im Stich gelassen/verraten. Und jetzt haben viele von ihnen die Nase voll und wollen nicht in den Kriegen anderer mitkämpfen. Das kann ich verstehen.
Das ist ein Grund, warum Trump überhaupt gewählt wurde (sowohl 2016 als auch 2024). Er versucht, das zu „korrigieren“ (oder sagt das zumindest).
Trump, wie er nunmal ist, tut das nicht mit diplomatischen Mitteln (obwohl Vance ihn als Chefdiplomat bezeichnete), sondern mit solchen offenen „Gesprächen“.
--> Europa hat sich als ernsthafter und vertrauenswürdiger Partner disqualifiziert.
Ich habe mehr über Europa geschrieben, 2020 und 2022.
2. Amerikaner, Ihr könnt (und werdet) es besser machen.
Rhetorisch gesehen ist Trump ein Beschwichtigungspolitiker, und wenn er das durchziehen würde, wäre das sehr, sehr schlecht für die ganze Welt.
Hier einige grundlegende Fakten zum Ukraine-Krieg:
- Russland/Putin hat mit dem Einmarsch in die Ukraine (im Februar 2022, eigentlich schon 2014) einen unprovozierten Krieg begonnen.
- Putin hat jeden Vertrag gebrochen, den er zuvor unterzeichnet hatte. Ohne Sicherheitsgarantien ist ein Waffenstillstand/Friedensabkommen mit Putin also nichts wert. Es ist illusorisch zu glauben, dass ein Friedensabkommen mit Putin von diesem eingehalten wird.
- Zelensky ist kein Diktator, sondern ein demokratisch gewähltes Oberhaupt eines souveränen Landes. Und er ist ein Held. Andere Staatschefs wären im Februar 2022 aus der Ukraine geflohen (wie Janukowitsch, wiki).
- Wenn die Ukraine (wie Israel) ihre Waffen niederlegt, werden die Ukrainer ausgelöscht. Wenn Russland (wie die Hamas) die Waffen niederlegt, wird es Frieden geben.
Während der Gespräche im Weißen Haus hätte Zelenskyy besser „auftreten“ und seine Gastgeber nicht unterbrechen sollen. Aber nach drei Jahren Krieg ist er von diesen Erfahrungen gezeichnet (zahllose Kriegsverbrechen an seinem Volk) und der Lügen über seine Person (Diktator, Kriegsschuld, Drogenmissbrauch) überdrüssig und einfach angepisst wegen der unzureichenden Unterstützung.
Als Zelensky richtigerweise darauf hinwies, dass die USA von den Ozeanen profitieren, die sie vor einer Invasion schützen (sehr hypothetische Nebenfrage: Wie hätte sich der Zweite Weltkrieg entwickelt, wenn es keinen Atlantik zwischen Frankreich und den USA gegeben hätte?), und dass die USA in Zukunft dennoch die Hauptlast eines Krieges zu spüren bekommen könnten, eskalierte die Lage ziemlich. Ich hoffe, dass er sich irrt, aber vielleicht werden sich Zelenskys Worte in einigen Jahren als prophetisch erweisen. Einen Aggressor wie Putin zu beschwichtigen, zeigt anderen Diktatoren, dass die auf Regeln basierende Ordnung am Ende ist und dass sie davon profitieren können, andere Länder anzugreifen, ohne dass dies ernsthafte Konsequenzen hat.
Die USA sind (vielleicht nicht rechtlich, aber moralisch) verpflichtet, die Ukraine zu schützen, wie es versprochen wurde, als die Ukraine ihre Atombomben aufgab (wie Außenminister Rubio hier sagt). Und Trump hat diese Pflicht geerbt. Er sollte sich dieser Pflicht nicht entziehen.
Trump und Vance griffen den Mann an, der einen grausamen Krieg für das Überleben seines Volkes führt, und behaupteten zu Unrecht, dass er sich nicht einmal bedankt (Beweis) oder dass er „den Krieg geschehen lässt“. Wie emotional verunsichert muss ein Mann sein, um ein „Danke“ oder „Entschuldigung“ zu verlangen? Ein „Entschuldigung“ oder „Dankeschön“, das nicht von selbst kommt, ist nichts wert.
Einen Mann anzugreifen, der um das Überleben seines Volkes und seines Landes kämpft, während man selbst
- im eigenen Land und
- im eigenen Schloss / Weißen Haus ist
- in der eigenen Sprache sprechen kann und
- umgeben von den eigenen Busenfreunden und Medien und
- in einer Position der militärischen und wirtschaftlichen Stärke ist
... ist die Zurschaustellung der eigenen Schwäche. Dies war der schwächste Moment von Trump und Vance, den ich bis jetzt gesehen habe.
Was wir gesehen haben, war die politisch rechte Version von Gretas lächerlichem „how dare you“:
- Greta ist in Schweden aufgewachsen, einer der reichsten und komfortabelsten Umgebungen, die es je auf diesem Planeten gegeben hat, und hat die Chuzpe / Unverschämtheit, Forderungen an die Gesellschaft zu stellen (die, wenn sie befolgt würden, dazu führen würden, dass arme Länder arm bleiben).
- Trump und Vance leben im stärksten, sichersten und insgesamt kapitalstärksten Land der Welt, einem Land, das eine fantastische historische Bilanz vorzuweisen hat, von der Gründung einer Republik mit demokratischen Elementen, der Abschaffung der Sklaverei, dem Sieg über die Nazis, der Einführung des Marshallplans, dem Sieg über die Sowjets und vielem mehr. Dennoch reagieren Trump und Vance unreif und dünnhäutig, wenn sie mit den Fakten und der Erwartung konfrontiert werden, dass sie ihre Verpflichtung zur Sicherung der Ukraine einhalten.
Hier mehr über die „woke Rechte“.
3. Was kommt als Nächstes?
Europa muss aufrüsten, und zwar gewaltig. Das wird viel kosten (natürlich durch Schulden finanziert), was die Inflation erhöhen wird. Und Inflation ist der ultimative Treiber für Populismus und Extremismus. Vorsicht, Europa!
Kurz- bis mittelfristig könnten diese Entwicklungen den USA (relativ) zugute kommen, da sie ihre Militärausgaben reduzieren und neu ausrichten können.
Die Herausforderung für Europa wird entweder die EU zerbrechen lassen oder sie wird dazu führen, dass sich die europäischen Länder zusammenschließen, um ihre zahllosen Probleme anzugehen und (teilweise oder größtenteils) zu lösen.
Ich kenne Trumps wahre Absichten nicht. Ich neige dazu zu glauben, dass er kein russisches Asset (wie Schröder) ist (das wäre so, als würde der Schwanz mit dem Hund wedeln), und denke oder hoffe, dass dies nur seine Art des Verhandelns ist (siehe sein Buch "the Art of the Deal"): Erst übt er maximalen Druck auf die EU aus, damit sie aufrüstet und Zelensky zwingt, einen (jeden?) Friedensvertrag zu akzeptieren, dann verhandelt Trump mit Putin, indem er ebenfalls maximalen Druck ausübt und schließlich einen Friedensvertrag erreicht. Dann wird Trump als Friedensstifter gefeiert und bekommt den Friedensnobelpreis, damit er sich beim Grillen mit seinem Kumpel Obama besser fühlt.
Da ich ein begeisterter Leser von Geschichte bin, habe ich mich immer gefragt, wie es war, turbulente Zeiten wie die Französische oder Amerikanische Revolution oder 1914-1945 zu erleben. Jetzt erlebe ich den Hauch einer solch dramatischen Zeit.
Passt auf Euch auf, Слава Україні! / Slava Ukraini , und have a nice day,
zuerich
Memes...
Your publication is very interesting, I pray to God to give you good health and continue writing. Happy day with your family
Very good, @zuerich. Would that people the world over adopt a similar mindset, which I believe has badly eroded in our lifetimes. By design? The answer to this question can be argued endlessly ...
My point? Simply that you have provided a balanced view, pros and cons, with some semblance of honesty, rationality, etc. Therefore, a meaningful dialog is possible.
Summed up and stating my point as succinctly as I can manage:
the "all or nothing"
mindsets of our time!
On both sides ... Your post does exactly that. "May your tribe increase" ...
More than one post, let alone comment, could be written, in response to a number of aspects of what you have shared with us. A comment on your post does not allow for that, nor does the available time.
Key to what unfolds from here?
Nor do I. Nor, I would say, do very many people. He seems to operate with a remarkably strong and resilient sense of being able to "make the call" necessary, at any given point in "real time," based on his deeply ingrained sense of what is right and what is wrong. What will work and what will not.
That a "game" of "5-D Chess"(? how many dimensions would be correct?) is being played at the moment, where the stakes could hardly be any higher on who "wins?" Indisputable, IMHO ...
With that, a key mistake is making any decision about what is going on short-term, especially with the continuous and relentless "noise" from his adversaries all in synch (hard to overstate the importance of this => who / what is behind determining what they say / do in unison?) screaming how "we" are supposed to view it.
In the long-term, we will find out.
Along the way, I will personally be rejecting the "all or nothing tsunami" washing back and forth all over and around us, all the time, in the attempts to drive "the narrative" (lies) of what someone somewhere has predetermined we are "supposed" to believe.
P.S. Not sure what happened upon posting this, @zuerich, but thought you might want to know there is no lead image showing with it. I do see the beginnings of an image hyperlink, but it appears at though it may have been truncated.
I like to watch videos on geopolitics, but finding this kind of content here totally captures my attention, I will be watching for any other summary, analysis and comments you make in your publications on these topics.
I hope that the Europeans will give a boost to their technological and military industry so that they can defend themselves and generate deterrence against any threat.
Russia "started an unprovoked war", are you serious? After years of shelling of the Russian minority in Eastern Ukraine?
"Zelensky is not a dictator,... is a hero"?
Sorry, but he de facto is a dictator, he banned any minority rights, and also banned elections.
This is a typical Russian narrative and massively distorting facts. Ukraine fought Russian-backed separatists in the Donetsk and Luhansk region. Ukraine conducted military actions including artillery shelling. Civilians were caught in the crossfire as in many military operations (see Gaza). This is military business as usual and not worth mentioning.
Then Franklin Delano Roosevelt was a dictator because of his treatment of minorities like Japanese Americans?
Churchill was a dictator because elections were suspended?
Zelensky did not ban (!) elections, elections were suspended under martial law because national elections (presidential as well as parliamentary) cannot be held during martial law, according to the Ukraine constitution. He is bound by the constitution and, by definition, not a dictator.
In any viewpoint there is a leeway / room for interpretation. I am not sure where the truth lies, but I am surprised that you are taking on 110% the interpretation of that obviously drug-addicted former comedian.
So you value the words of a former KGB spy (whose puffy face shows signs of drug abuse) who lives in a lawless country more than that of a former comedian who is subject to constant criticism?
Concerning truth: to evaluate who invaded whom, I do not need to trust Zelensky. To evaluate that Putin has zero responsibility or authority for people that do not live within Russia's borders ("ethnic Russian" or not) and that he has zero legitimacy to invade Ukraine, I also do not need to trust anybody. I only need basic knowledge of public and international law (and that, I do have. Way more than Baerbock, and I can prove it 😉). These are self-evident facts.
Frightening thoughts! They trouble me too, especially since I live in Eastern Europe...
It's hard for me to read this dispassionately. Nothing you say here offends me (I'm an American, as you probably know).
I agree wholeheartedly with your view on appeasement. It's not just Putin I don't trust, but the history of Russia shows it is not a good neighbor (ask the Poles who struggled to throw off the Russian yoke for much of modern history). Whatever your view on Europe's failings as an ally, it does not strengthen the U.S. to weaken its ally (Europe). If Ukraine falls, that is a blow to Europe's security, and eventually U. S. security.
I read an interesting opinion piece in Geopolitical Monitor (new source for me) that offers an enlightening (for me) perspective on Trump's Russia policy.
I don't claim to be clever enough to figure out what's best for U.S. security, but I'm taking a guess. It's best perhaps that we keep our alliances, because Europe, and Canada (!), share our values, basically and so far neither has been predatory (although perhaps the trade policy has not been fair? I don't know).
Then there is the other issue you raise: morality. Zelensky is a hero. I watched the tape of him in 2019. Compare that to the way he looks today. This war has taken a toll on him physically. It's been a long six years.
I feel it in my bones. Hard for me to write about anything else because this is so important. But life goes on and I try to keep a balance.
Thanks for this piece, @zuerich....riveting read.
That is a very interesting point. Velina Tchakarova (whose tweet I shares in my post above) also wrote that Trump tries to break the Sino-Russian Alliance (she calls it the "dragonbear"). I have my doubts that this can work. And even if it works, what are the costs? Throwing Europe and other Allies under the bus? In my opinion, Ukraine with a strong support (stop buying anything from Russia, freeze Russian oligarch's 300 billion USD and send it to Ukraine) by EU and the US can defeat Russia easily, and by that discourage China from even trying to expand (towards Taiwan or the South China Sea).
I fully agree. And Trump called him a dictator. I think Zelensky would be glad if he could resign. But are there any potential successors with his competence? I don't know.
I agree. It could prevail. I don't know why, but it seems Trump does not want that. It's crazy (on my part, maybe) but I really think he sees himself in an imperial role, with an empire that can coexist with other empires. He really does want Canada and Greenland. He completely understands Russia's appetite and is willing to throw Europe 'under the bus'.
What is dangerous in my country is the cult of personality. I don't know if outside of the U.S. there is an understanding of how great this phenomenon is. Someone just rode up from the South along a major highway and saw a rooftop with the word "Trump" painted on it. He is followed with religious fervor. There is tremendous power in that. The possibility of domestic upheaval here is not small.
We are not operating in a classic political atmosphere. The U. S. may be the most powerful nation in the world, but we are not stable at the moment. You and I are making judgements based on what we know to be reasonable. Maybe there are no rules as we know them?