RE: Not My Meme! #614
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
While what we actually need is to give the rest of us the ability to commit violence against a small group of people!:)
0
0
0.000
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
While what we actually need is to give the rest of us the ability to commit violence against a small group of people!:)
I think the 'founding fathers' put that in writing.
https://www.learnliberty.org/blog/the-declaration-of-independence-says-we-have-the-right-to-overthrow-the-government/
Then, treasonous traitors try to take that right away to stay in power.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2385
I say, anybody controlling others through the use, or threat, of violence is the issue.
If one's utopia requires armed thugs to persist, it sucks.™
But, the most elegant solution may just be in ignoring them.
At least until they bring the violence to us personally.
Then let's hope that our self defense skillz are up to the task.
Rule by force is the disease.
We are our keepers.
You'll find few who think so. For too many, the state is their keeper, providing housing,
income and medical care while nudging them in whichever direction they wish to take them.
Society is being nudged off a cliff and the pile of too many at the bottom excludes that few we find refusing to trade principle for pay, veritas for violence, or love for lust.