Not My Meme! #614

Do we?

It is difficult to deny that voters validate our deeply fraudulent elections. However, it is also difficult to blame them, because it is a deeply disputed issue in which every possible side has deliberately misled everyone. Poisoned wells are not safe to drink from, so my assessment is that the very fact election dissent is infiltrated and false narratives disseminated - even trumpeted - by official propagandists demonstrates US elections are fraudulent.

"Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. Fraudulent elections cut the strings between the righteous puppeteers and what should be their puppets, our elected officials, and this is not a light and transient thing, but the destruction of representation, which was a primary reason Americans founded America to begin with.

Thos. Jefferson's revolutionary schedule recommendation (that about every 20 years government would need a revolutionary makeover) has been long ignored, and perhaps the exigency we find ourselves in today is a result of too much prudence and too little righting. We have but to look to England to see what havoc we'd be suffering today had our revolutionary founding father's not abolished the monarchy by force of arms and bloodshed. They did so that we would have representation, and not be ruled by the rich and powerful that grant themselves titles of nobility and divine right to enslave us. To be worthy of the blood and bullets our forefather's shed to get that representation, we need to keep it.

We have lost it today. If we're not to remain slaves of our betters, we need to get it back, and the sooner the better. Looking at England we see the lack of representation there makes things worse the longer it lasts. English subjects are being captured and caged for years because they gesticulate and speak to police disrepectfully. I read today that mere presence at a riot engenders guilt of rioting, even if you were just watching, according to some high born judge in England.

I disagree that punishing a population is just, and note that it is considered a war crime by the ICJ. I'm pretty sure English law says somewhere that the English can only be convicted of a crime they actually committed, rather than one they merely saw, which means that the disarmed and hapless English people have no means of resorting to force of arms to prevent the government from committing criminal tyranny against them, and that is sure what that judge is doing.

A couple years back Sen. Brian Boquist of Oregon fled the capitol and the Governor of Oregon ordered the Oregon State Police to arrest him and force him onto the senate floor to create a quorum so that legislation could be passed (which is what Boquist was preventing by fleeing the capitol). Boquist has been a military contractor, and was captured and held in Iraq while fighting there. He held a press conference when the governor's order to have him arrested came to his knowledge and stated that he had been a political prisoner before, and if the Oregon State Police intended to arrest him and make him a political prisoner in America for serving his community as a state senator, they'd better only send bachelors and make sure they were heavily armed, because he was heavily armed and would not allow himself to be taken prisoner.

That's why we need representation, and why we have a codified right to keep and bear arms that government is prohibited from infringing by the document that grants government it's authority. Infringing on that right to have guns to shoot government agents that seek to make us political prisoners removes the grant of authority government is availed by that document, because by infringing on our right to keep and bear arms government is voiding the document, leaving government without lawful authority, just as if Americans had no representation.

That's two strikes already. I bet we can all count to three without any trouble.

Edit: you inspired a post.

I think the 'founding fathers' put that in writing.
https://www.learnliberty.org/blog/the-declaration-of-independence-says-we-have-the-right-to-overthrow-the-government/
Then, treasonous traitors try to take that right away to stay in power.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2385

I say, anybody controlling others through the use, or threat, of violence is the issue.
If one's utopia requires armed thugs to persist, it sucks.™

But, the most elegant solution may just be in ignoring them.
At least until they bring the violence to us personally.
Then let's hope that our self defense skillz are up to the task.

Rule by force is the disease.

We are our keepers.

I'd think very few people identify with the drooler.
Even the back the blue crowd would use their doublethinc, so they didn't have to id as the moron.