The official story doesn't add up
You know, I’ve been debating with myself about whether I should write this. Mostly because I’m not trying to get into drama. But the truth is, it’s hard for me not to fall down the rabbit hole.
Let me be clear: I’m not claiming to know what really happened. I just don’t buy the official story. In fact, I’m pretty sure the official story is made up. Why lie? That’s the part I can’t pin down.
Now, I’ll be the first to admit my lack of expertise. I’ve shot guns a few times in my life and even owned one years back, but I’m not a “gun person.” That caveat matters because I suspect I’m in the majority. Most people don’t know much about rifle calibers, and when the story about the shooter came out, they probably just accepted it without question.
At first, the idea that he disassembled the gun made sense to me. But then I learned that model is hard to take apart, and even if you do, it’s still massive—no way you could hide it in a backpack. Same with the claim about the fatal shot. It seemed believable until I learned that caliber of bullet is used to hunt elk. Gun enthusiasts pointed out that a shot from that distance wouldn’t just injure, it could nearly decapitate a man. Some even ran tests to show this.
And the story just kept getting stranger. The supposed conversation between the shooter and his roommate read like something a 50-year-old asked ChatGPT to write. It neatly filled all the plot holes, but at the same time, the way the shooter spoke sounded nothing like how kids talk today. A lot of people picked up on that.
Before anyone accuses me of being a liberal plant or whatever, let me point out that the people raising questions are not liberals. Unless you want to call Alex Jones a liberal, which, sure, you’re entitled to do.
Unfortunately, this bizarre story has also attracted some ugly voices. Antisemites are “connecting dots” and claiming it was none other than Bibi himself who ordered Charlie’s death. That accusation even forced the Prime Minister to appear on camera and publicly deny involvement. A surreal moment, but also a sign of how crazy things have become.
Still, there’s one thing about all this that really grinds my gears: the opportunism. Yes, I shouldn’t be surprised. I guess I’m not. But that doesn’t make it any less disgusting.
Getting an email from Charlie’s wife asking for $5 “to protect Kirk’s legacy” felt especially gross.
But you know what they say: never let a tragedy go to waste. And it seems they’ve taken that advice to heart. What does this say about our society these days? you tell me...
MenO
Had never heard of Mr. Kirk prior to his murder. During the rise of the religious right in the '80s it was my feeling that they had lost the move for power. It seems that was a misunderstanding on my part and they went back to building that base. Mr. Kirk seemed to be rallying the younger constituency. No matter the motives of anyone participating in his murder; the context of events in a declining empire make the event all the more difficult to nail down to a couple of bullet points. Round up the usual suspects! 😊
everything that is happening in the aftermath is proof of the rot...
You're correct in your disbelief regarding the official narrative. There's other information that has come out you didn't mention, but the plainly obvious evidence of your eyes that Tyler Robinson didn't have a scoped rifle going up to the roof, nor jumping off of it, means he couldn't have shot Charlie Kirk with one - if those pics and the video is even him.
I have shot an elk in the spine with a .30-06. It killed the elk on the spot, by shattering the vertebra and piercing the heart with splinters of bone. Elk are ~5x larger and more robust than humans. There was a considerable exit wound(s) as most of the shrapnel of bone was pushed by the energy of the bullet in the direction the bullet was traveling, creating several exit wounds opposite the entry wound. It is not credible that a shot from a .30-06 wouldn't have created an exit wound in the same way on a human. It turns out there has been no autopsy of Charlie Kirk, and an autopsy is necessary to determine details like the caliber of the bullet, the bullet trajectory, and would reveal that a different rifle than Grandpa's .30-06 was used to kill Charlie Kirk.
I don't believe anything the FBI has said about Tyler Robinson, because they're plainly lying about him having the rifle on the roof, and about the bullet that killed Kirk being from a .30-06. They're setting him up as a patsy by stating these lies, so nothing they say about this matter has any credibility whatsoever. So, whom can assassinate an America citizen in a spectacularly public way and get the FBI to set up a patsy to take the blame so they can get away with it? Whom has profited by taking over TPUSA? Whom was threatened by Charlie Kirk demanding the Epstein files be released to the public, claiming that the IDF stood down during Oct. 7th, and stating Israel was ethnically cleansing Gaza? Whomever meets all these criteria had the ability and multiple motives to commit the murder. There is one entity that meets all these criteria - and it isn't Trantifa.
Thanks!
Edit: additionally, there was essentially no crime scene investigation. There is video of people walking around the site, standing on the chair Charlie Kirk was sitting on when he was murdered, taking down cameras and removing the SD cards that were in them, all before police were present on the site, for ~40 minutes. A reason the crime scene wouldn't be scrupulously examined is that the actual facts and evidence aren't useful when framing a patsy.
The FBI has zero credibility, and very much appears to be an accessory after the fact to the murder to me.
Did you see the lapel mic theory video?
As you may note from my comment, I try to stick to simple evidence that is probative. There is a lapel mic theory, a holographic projector theory, and all manner of speculation that is caused by the reaction of people with personal biases to the blatant fake news promulgated by official agencies and media. By sticking to the simplest facts I can ascertain I strive to not depend on genius I don't have to crack the case with information I don't have either. Another simple fact is the speed of sound, and there are claims that the time it took for the sound of the rifle being fired to reach the target the bullet struck, ~.2 seconds, proves that the shot was fired from <100 feet, and not the >100 yards the Tyler Robinson theory claims.
IMG source - Reddit.com
There are multiple videos that have been published that enable anyone to compare the time and ascertain how long that took on each of the videos and also to use the speed of sound to calculate the distance from the target the shot was fired from themselves. Because I have already ascertained the FBI is lying and Tyler Robinson did not shoot Charlie Kirk with Grandpa's .30-06, and I am not trying to solve the crime myself, I have not done that calculation. However, this seems to be an alternative means of proving the FBI is lying - if that's what the calculation shows.
There isn't much information that I have about the Charlie Kirk murder that I consider reliably factual. Video can be contrived by AI, and I am confident there is AI generated video being published on the event. The claim by the FBI that the pics of Tyler Robinson climbing stairs to the roof, and video they claim is Tyler Robinson jumping from the roof, show him in possession of Grandpa's .30-06 is demonstrably false. Whether or not that is actually Tyler Robinson in those images, they do not show him in possession of that rifle because in the pics walking up the stairs he is wearing tight clothing in which you can plainly see his cell phone printing in his front pocket, and that is less than 1/2" thick. The disassembled parts of the rifle, even if most of the parts were inside his backpack, would necessarily protrude at least 12", and even the thin end of the barrel/action assembly is thicker than his cell phone, while the stock is ~2" thick and wide at the forend, and the butt is ~2" thick and ~6" wide, and both of them would be plainly obvious if he stuffed them into his pants. Neither did he have either one of them in hand jumping off the roof, much less both of them.
This simply proves the FBI is lying, and that asks the question why they are lying about Tyler Robinson and Grandpa's .30-06, and that results in the criteria about the abilities and motives that apply to the actual murderer with the power and influence to get the FBI to create a patsy to conceal their guilt so they could get away with murder. Occam's Razor is very useful to people as stupid as I am trying to understand what has really happened when there are lies and fake news being published in order to prevent me from understanding what has really happened, and that's why I do my best to stick to what is demonstrably true and not speculate beyond my feeble intellectual capability in an attempt to know things I cannot know for sure.
One datum that regards motive is that the US Congress voted not to release the Epstein files 3 hours before Charlie Kirk was murdered in a very public spectacle, that has completely prevented any discussion of Congress voting to keep rule by blackmail of America, just like Donald Rumsfeld's statement on 9/10/01 that the Pentagon could not account for >$2T in expenditures, and that very alarming admission was almost never discussed again after 9/11/01 and the destruction of the offices of the accountants charged with tracking Pentagon expenditures in the terrorist attack on the Pentagon.
I'm glad someone else came out and said it, because yeah....
did you read the alleged msg exchange between the "shooter" and his boyfriend?
Impossible to believe.
Yeah, I have a younger sister about that age, and I don't care "how mature" the kid was, they do not text like that, ever, not even if it's serious...
Nothing has added up, going back to Drumpf's "assassination" attempt which supposedly blew off a bit of his ear, a thing that some experts have mentioned would have been much more damaging and certainly wouldn't have healed as quickly as his seemed to.
But we are at the point where to ask any questions is unamerican and will get you attacked my the MAGA faithful.
Oh yes.. the cult demands loyalty to the centralized msg. Whatever comes from the top, you parrot or you are an enemy.
I haven't paid close attention to the official story, but it was my understanding that they recovered the rifle on the rooftop.
He could have easily planted the rifle prior to the event, and then left it behind.
As for the exit wound...
There's more to that than just bullet caliber. The actual type of projectile used makes a HUGE difference, as does the powder load, the rifle itself, etc. One thing I've heard that I can say for sure did NOT happen: they definitely did not find that bullet lodged in Kirk's neck bone, unless it was a severely underpowered, hand-loaded round.
Here's a bit of info we can't miss.
Regarding the Rifle, it was recovered in a towel in the bushes. So, the official story is he had jumped off the roof with it inside the backpack and then re-assembled it, and left it in the bushes.
That official story about the rifle is needlessly complicated. He could have easily wrapped it in a towel and tossed it in the bushes from the roof, no disassembly required.
tell me this is not hilarious:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c99g1e0z2ero
I didn't find any humor there.
I'm being sarcastic. This is the official story. This is the convo they said they had. I was not being literal.
Fair enough. While I can easily see where someone might find the conversation contrived, I know a few Twilight fans who write to each other like this.
There are many things in that if you don't have a full experience about it