It could be any one of us.
The murder of Wayne Broadhurst (pictured above) in a terrible stabbing attack, allegedly carried out by an Afghan migrant, in the outer London area of Uxbridge, is both a terrible and unnecessary tragedy for Mr Broadhurst’s family and also a milestone for British society. Mr Broadhurst, 49, had been walking his dog when he encountered the Afghan, named as Safi Dawood, 22 allegedly attacking a 14 year old boy. As a decent British subject and also as a decent human being, Mr Broadhurst tried to protect the teenager only, it is said, to be stabbed to death by Dawood.
Dawood, who is described as an ‘Afghan refugee’ in some news reports, was also living in Uxbridge at the time although rumours that he was living in a hotel stuffed with illegals by the government are at present unconfirmed. What’s clear however is that Dawood and the tens of thousands like him should never ever have been allowed to set foot on British shores. If he’d been kept away then Mr Broadhurst would have been alive today.
The purpose of this article is not to go over the details of the horrendous crime itself but to look into its possible effects and it other meanings. I have observed that other writers have done a far better job of covering that aspect of the story than I could.
One of the other meanings, which is going ot have societal effects, of this terrible and highly preventable crime is that it signals to the rest of Britons that we are not safe. We now know and understand that any of us could be, in turn, attacked like Mr Broadhurst was. It doesn’t matter who the Briton is or what we might be doing, any of us could be attacked by an imported savage who is never ever going to be safe to live alongside with. We could be taking our kids to school, walking the dog, going shopping, going to watch sport, or to work or any number of normal things when suddenly we could find outselves under attack from some unwanted, unneeded imported savage. We would be attacked by a savage who had been imported mainly to salve the concsiences of a small number of well connected people who are obsessed by ‘refugee’ matters and push that obsession no matter what the cost to the rest of us. The politicians then virtue-signal to the ‘refugee’ obsessives and we then end up with policies that have resulted in monsters being dumped in our midst.
The disaster, some would saythe treason, of the policy of the mass importation of savages such as Dawood is now such a monstrous and widely spread phenomenon that no Briton can truly consider themselves safe from harm from these imported savages. Labour’s policy of scattering these invaders across the country has ensured that no longer are these savages put in places that have already been ruined (and ruined to a large extent by excessive levels of and inappropriate types of immigration), but are now everywhere. Labour has ensured that you will not be safe from those who should never have been allowed into Britain. This removal of safety from assault by unwanted savages applies everywhere now no matter whether you live in a big city or a medium sized town or a village or even in somewhere more rural, everywhere can now feel the ‘enrichment’ of the sort of savages that once our armies might have fought against.
We could all end up like Mr Broadhurst. Any one of us could fall victim to savages like Dawood. It doesn’t matter who we are or where we are or what we are doing, death at the hands of a savage, is a distinct possiblity and we should curse the politicians, civil servants and NGO’s who have brought this terrible and dangerous situation about.
May the memory of Mr Broadhurst be for a blessing and may those who misrule over us who helped to import the savage who killed him be cursed for their actions.