Musk: Obsessed with Legacy

img src: financialexpress

On more than one occasion, I’ve dared to criticize Elon Musk, and naturally, it’s stirred up anger from some quarters. In their eyes, I’m either a fool or a victim of liberal propaganda. There's this unspoken rule that we’re all supposed to fall in line, pick a side, and defend it at all costs. But here’s the thing: I don’t buy into that mentality. I don’t think Elon and I could ever be on the same team. We have no common ground, no shared moral compass. And even if I did happen to own three Teslas and was on the verge of getting a Cybertruck—Elon is just a man, not a deity to be worshipped. Like all men, he’s flawed and deserves scrutiny.

I don’t deny that Elon has contributed to the world in significant ways, and I acknowledge his role in pushing forward some notable technologies. But my criticism of him has little to do with that. It’s more about the bizarre notion that he’s above reproach. The idea that if he stayed in the Democrat camp, people like me wouldn’t dare raise a finger. This couldn’t be more wrong. I don’t know where to begin.

To his die-hard fans, I’m already off the rails here, but let’s get this clear: I’m not imposing my moral framework on anyone. Just as I reject their attempts to impose theirs on me, I have every right to call out the rot I see. And frankly, someone with a string of baby mamas and a weird obsession with breeding is not a figure I’m inclined to idolize. I’m more traditional than that. And the more I uncover, the more it feels like there’s even deeper rot lurking behind the scenes.

Take Tiffany Wong, for example. Not long ago, she was a rising star on Twitter, reportedly making ten to twenty thousand dollars a month off her viral tweets. Elon, ever the opportunist, noticed her growing presence. Whether she got a little algorithmic push from him or not is unclear, but her stardom seemed to coincide with his involvement.

Elon reached out to her directly, slid into her DMs, and made his intentions known—though I hesitate to call it "courting," because it’s honestly more unsettling than that. He reportedly asked Tiffany to bear his child. While some might call this romantic, I don’t see it that way, especially given his past behavior.

Tiffany, wisely, declined, but not before confiding in Ashley St. Clair about the situation. It turns out Ashley, unbeknownst to Tiffany, was pregnant with Elon’s child at the time. A classic soap opera, right?

Elon didn’t take too kindly to Tiffany reaching out to Ashley. He reportedly felt betrayed, leading to a change in Tiffany’s Twitter algorithm that saw her stardom choke out. Her visibility plummeted, and the platform did its job in stifling her.

Now, I’m not here to lecture Ashley or Tiffany. They have their reasons, and as far as I know, they were never forced into anything. But let’s pause here. The idea that Elon is some untouchable, god-like figure who can do no wrong? That’s a narrative we need to challenge.

I can’t read his mind, but there’s something about his obsession with reproduction that raises eyebrows. It’s not about providing a loving, present father for his children; it’s just about making more of them. I see it tied to his rhetoric about America needing more children—a message that feels strangely urgent. And when I try to make sense of it, I’m left with a picture that feels more like something out of a Stephen King novel than a well-intentioned call for demographic balance.

I came across some discussions on Reddit—take this with a grain of salt, because Reddit is hardly a reliable source—but the idea that Elon’s fathered seventeen children is not far-fetched. He’s reportedly made similar “special offers” to other women since becoming the world’s richest man. Tiffany isn’t the first woman he’s reached out to with these peculiar propositions. And who knows how many more there are?

But it’s not about judging those women—hypothetical or real. It’s about acknowledging that Elon’s fixation isn’t on just sex; it’s about passing on his genes, accumulating biological heirs like trophies.

Now, before anyone accuses me of being unfair, let me ask this: in any other context, traditional men would look at someone fathering children and emotionally abandoning them as a terrible father, a man who’s failed his offspring. Yet somehow, Elon gets a pass. Why? Is it the money? Because if that’s the case, are we admitting that our principles are for sale?

Mine certainly aren’t.

MenO