RE: The official story doesn't add up
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
You're correct in your disbelief regarding the official narrative. There's other information that has come out you didn't mention, but the plainly obvious evidence of your eyes that Tyler Robinson didn't have a scoped rifle going up to the roof, nor jumping off of it, means he couldn't have shot Charlie Kirk with one - if those pics and the video is even him.
I have shot an elk in the spine with a .30-06. It killed the elk on the spot, by shattering the vertebra and piercing the heart with splinters of bone. Elk are ~5x larger and more robust than humans. There was a considerable exit wound(s) as most of the shrapnel of bone was pushed by the energy of the bullet in the direction the bullet was traveling, creating several exit wounds opposite the entry wound. It is not credible that a shot from a .30-06 wouldn't have created an exit wound in the same way on a human. It turns out there has been no autopsy of Charlie Kirk, and an autopsy is necessary to determine details like the caliber of the bullet, the bullet trajectory, and would reveal that a different rifle than Grandpa's .30-06 was used to kill Charlie Kirk.
I don't believe anything the FBI has said about Tyler Robinson, because they're plainly lying about him having the rifle on the roof, and about the bullet that killed Kirk being from a .30-06. They're setting him up as a patsy by stating these lies, so nothing they say about this matter has any credibility whatsoever. So, whom can assassinate an America citizen in a spectacularly public way and get the FBI to set up a patsy to take the blame so they can get away with it? Whom has profited by taking over TPUSA? Whom was threatened by Charlie Kirk demanding the Epstein files be released to the public, claiming that the IDF stood down during Oct. 7th, and stating Israel was ethnically cleansing Gaza? Whomever meets all these criteria had the ability and multiple motives to commit the murder. There is one entity that meets all these criteria - and it isn't Trantifa.
Thanks!
Edit: additionally, there was essentially no crime scene investigation. There is video of people walking around the site, standing on the chair Charlie Kirk was sitting on when he was murdered, taking down cameras and removing the SD cards that were in them, all before police were present on the site, for ~40 minutes. A reason the crime scene wouldn't be scrupulously examined is that the actual facts and evidence aren't useful when framing a patsy.
The FBI has zero credibility, and very much appears to be an accessory after the fact to the murder to me.
Did you see the lapel mic theory video?
As you may note from my comment, I try to stick to simple evidence that is probative. There is a lapel mic theory, a holographic projector theory, and all manner of speculation that is caused by the reaction of people with personal biases to the blatant fake news promulgated by official agencies and media. By sticking to the simplest facts I can ascertain I strive to not depend on genius I don't have to crack the case with information I don't have either. Another simple fact is the speed of sound, and there are claims that the time it took for the sound of the rifle being fired to reach the target the bullet struck, ~.2 seconds, proves that the shot was fired from <100 feet, and not the >100 yards the Tyler Robinson theory claims.
IMG source - Reddit.com
There are multiple videos that have been published that enable anyone to compare the time and ascertain how long that took on each of the videos and also to use the speed of sound to calculate the distance from the target the shot was fired from themselves. Because I have already ascertained the FBI is lying and Tyler Robinson did not shoot Charlie Kirk with Grandpa's .30-06, and I am not trying to solve the crime myself, I have not done that calculation. However, this seems to be an alternative means of proving the FBI is lying - if that's what the calculation shows.
There isn't much information that I have about the Charlie Kirk murder that I consider reliably factual. Video can be contrived by AI, and I am confident there is AI generated video being published on the event. The claim by the FBI that the pics of Tyler Robinson climbing stairs to the roof, and video they claim is Tyler Robinson jumping from the roof, show him in possession of Grandpa's .30-06 is demonstrably false. Whether or not that is actually Tyler Robinson in those images, they do not show him in possession of that rifle because in the pics walking up the stairs he is wearing tight clothing in which you can plainly see his cell phone printing in his front pocket, and that is less than 1/2" thick. The disassembled parts of the rifle, even if most of the parts were inside his backpack, would necessarily protrude at least 12", and even the thin end of the barrel/action assembly is thicker than his cell phone, while the stock is ~2" thick and wide at the forend, and the butt is ~2" thick and ~6" wide, and both of them would be plainly obvious if he stuffed them into his pants. Neither did he have either one of them in hand jumping off the roof, much less both of them.
This simply proves the FBI is lying, and that asks the question why they are lying about Tyler Robinson and Grandpa's .30-06, and that results in the criteria about the abilities and motives that apply to the actual murderer with the power and influence to get the FBI to create a patsy to conceal their guilt so they could get away with murder. Occam's Razor is very useful to people as stupid as I am trying to understand what has really happened when there are lies and fake news being published in order to prevent me from understanding what has really happened, and that's why I do my best to stick to what is demonstrably true and not speculate beyond my feeble intellectual capability in an attempt to know things I cannot know for sure.
One datum that regards motive is that the US Congress voted not to release the Epstein files 3 hours before Charlie Kirk was murdered in a very public spectacle, that has completely prevented any discussion of Congress voting to keep rule by blackmail of America, just like Donald Rumsfeld's statement on 9/10/01 that the Pentagon could not account for >$2T in expenditures, and that very alarming admission was almost never discussed again after 9/11/01 and the destruction of the offices of the accountants charged with tracking Pentagon expenditures in the terrorist attack on the Pentagon.