Fragile or Rigid rules?

I live in a country with fragile rules and I've noticed how porous the system is. Sometimes countries with rigid rules seem too hard for the countrymen to enjoy some free air. But in a case where I'll have to choose between rigid and fragile rules, I'll go for the rigid country with strong rules and regulations because of the following reasons; such a country has a working system, a yes is a yes and a no a no. A country with strong rules has less cases of corruption and orderliness is maintained. This is different in the case of a country with weak rules where no reverence is attached to the laws guiding certain conducts.

Image generated using Gemini AI

Would we be able to live in a country with no rules someday? , The answer is No. As long as we have a body of people called governments, we'll surely have a rule guiding its people, whether it's weak or strong, there'll be a rule and that's fine, because these rules are what regulates our behavior and ensures moral principles in a country. A country with no rules, means a country where everyone is free to allow their desire to take dominance, not minding whether it's evil or good, harmful to another or not, as long as it makes them happy.

A lawless country may look like freedom until we no longer have authority over our very own children, or a state where nothing guides our morals and we look around to see the destruction we've done, or the monster we've become. A fragile rule or a Rigid rule has both merit and demerit, a balance is what the world needs.